We've just received word from the wonderful folks @ DNA11 (makers of DNA art) that ROFLDNA is nearing completion. But we're at an impasse and we need your help. There are currently two designs on the virtual table for how we can arrange our collection of signatures within the DNA artwork.
[caption id="attachment_563" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="ROFLDNA art version 1"]
[/caption]
[/caption]The above version has a wholesome uniformity to it.
[caption id="attachment_564" align="aligncenter" width="300" caption="ROFLDNA art version 2"]
[/caption]
[/caption]Whereas this version better reflects the chaos that is the Internet memescape. It's profound, really.
Well, we'd like you to weigh in, either in the comments, on the twitter, or via email. The breadpig will make a decision by this weekend. It's counting on you, Art History majors, we all are.
[…] ← New ROFLDNA Milestone Reached – A Decision Must Be Made […]
You apparently seem to be leaning towards the “profound” choice. Please reconsider. I prefer the cleaner one with the signatures.The second arrangement ruins the effect for me, those blue streaks and dead space are pretty cool and don't need the writing cluttering it up. Also, it seems a little…possessive. Like the signatures are claiming the piece as their own, ruining its effect in the process. DNA belongs to everyone!